It's been awhile since I have posted on here but after reading snap's frustration I want to officially mirror snap's concern. Before anyone reads, please don't castigate me for voicing an opinion!! I know I'm not on here a ton, especially recently, but VSIDO is really the forum I call home!! So, if you're a systemd fan, caveat emptor, I have antipathy for it.
[tirade]
When running only VSIDO, it was systemd that borked my system. First audio. Fixed it. Then x. Fixed it. Then network connectivity. Omg what abject buggery and prestidigitation to fix that. Then a long list of floggings. I jumped to Debian SID, which I confess, was marvelous. Actually the Debian SID build your own taught me a lot. Then, systemd and the 4.0 kernel tag teamed me - borked that too. Pavlovian condition. Done.
I have moved on from the ashes of the once great Debian. I won't use that steaming heap anymore.
Systemd was implemented despite the outcries of the linux community. Foisted upon users. In a concerted cross distro effort. What was the impetus for this? To speed up start times like everyone says? Sorry, that smells like kyarn to me. I don't believe that for a moment. What unseen, unheard, behind the scenes effort could have so rapidly coerced so many distros to systemd? For what purpose. I can only speculate.
I'm nurturing a multi install system. I'm not happy with it yet, but learning a lot. If you're looking for a systemd free alternative which is Debian, Antix is pretty solid and reminds me a bit of VSIDO, only without the SID.I have it just in case. The SID version is a systemd-viant. Other Debians, Devuan and Dyne, are trying to rock it sans systemd. As I said, I have been conditioned away from Debian at this point. The systems I'm trying to set up are Alpine and Gentoo. Gentoo is taking me a while but it is very interesting to learn. One thing I'm learning is patience Alpine was not quite a snap to install (mainly because their instructions tell you to use fdisk, which I did, on my gpt system (sending me back to GRUB/MBR/part school) but once running, I found its package managment, apk, a ports system, very easy to learn/use; it feels like a cross between apt and git, but simpler and smarter. Alpine has a goodly number of setup scripts, quite handy. It's not perfect: chsh doesn't seem to be available to me, and I cannot seem to change the shell from ash to zsh, the repos aren't as large (no cwm, no ranger, no bsd-games, no cli candy like cmatrix, screenfetch, figlet, etc) but it's a different distro to learn and hella hella fast. Thankfully it has other software I use though, Openbox, Fluxbox, Awesome. And it feels like VSIDO in the sense of being minimal.
I don't know how long I'll stick with those distros. I came to linux because of 'live free or die'. systemd is not living free. systemd=die. It could well be the deathknell to the spirit of linux.
Snap: I'm with ya.
[/tirade]
I know others have had better experiences with systemd, but mine has been very rough, and the amount of info I have learnt seems to be better used elsewhere. If you can all live with systemd, go for it. I can't.
[tirade]
When running only VSIDO, it was systemd that borked my system. First audio. Fixed it. Then x. Fixed it. Then network connectivity. Omg what abject buggery and prestidigitation to fix that. Then a long list of floggings. I jumped to Debian SID, which I confess, was marvelous. Actually the Debian SID build your own taught me a lot. Then, systemd and the 4.0 kernel tag teamed me - borked that too. Pavlovian condition. Done.
I have moved on from the ashes of the once great Debian. I won't use that steaming heap anymore.
Systemd was implemented despite the outcries of the linux community. Foisted upon users. In a concerted cross distro effort. What was the impetus for this? To speed up start times like everyone says? Sorry, that smells like kyarn to me. I don't believe that for a moment. What unseen, unheard, behind the scenes effort could have so rapidly coerced so many distros to systemd? For what purpose. I can only speculate.
I'm nurturing a multi install system. I'm not happy with it yet, but learning a lot. If you're looking for a systemd free alternative which is Debian, Antix is pretty solid and reminds me a bit of VSIDO, only without the SID.I have it just in case. The SID version is a systemd-viant. Other Debians, Devuan and Dyne, are trying to rock it sans systemd. As I said, I have been conditioned away from Debian at this point. The systems I'm trying to set up are Alpine and Gentoo. Gentoo is taking me a while but it is very interesting to learn. One thing I'm learning is patience Alpine was not quite a snap to install (mainly because their instructions tell you to use fdisk, which I did, on my gpt system (sending me back to GRUB/MBR/part school) but once running, I found its package managment, apk, a ports system, very easy to learn/use; it feels like a cross between apt and git, but simpler and smarter. Alpine has a goodly number of setup scripts, quite handy. It's not perfect: chsh doesn't seem to be available to me, and I cannot seem to change the shell from ash to zsh, the repos aren't as large (no cwm, no ranger, no bsd-games, no cli candy like cmatrix, screenfetch, figlet, etc) but it's a different distro to learn and hella hella fast. Thankfully it has other software I use though, Openbox, Fluxbox, Awesome. And it feels like VSIDO in the sense of being minimal.
I don't know how long I'll stick with those distros. I came to linux because of 'live free or die'. systemd is not living free. systemd=die. It could well be the deathknell to the spirit of linux.
Snap: I'm with ya.
[/tirade]
I know others have had better experiences with systemd, but mine has been very rough, and the amount of info I have learnt seems to be better used elsewhere. If you can all live with systemd, go for it. I can't.